June 19, 2007

Commonwealth Court Agrees that a Surviving Dependent Parent May Collect Workers' Compensation Benefits for a Deceased Child

In some instances, the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act provides for survivor benefits to the decdents of those fatally injured in a work accident. The Act provides for payment of benefits to a surviving parent of the deceased worker in cases where the parent was dependent upon the worker for support. In the context of a workers' compensation claim, the test of dependency is whether or not the child's earnings were needed to provide the parent or parents with some of the ordinary necessities of life for the typical person in the parent's social and economic position.

In Wyoming Valley Health Care Systems v. WCAB (Kalwaytis), the Commonwealth Court looked at a case where a social worker was killed in a work-related motor vehicle accident. The deceased worker had been residing with her mother. Her mother filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits alleging that she was partially dependent on her daughter at the time of the accident. The workers' compensation judge was presented with detailed financial information for both the mother and daughter and considered their combined household expenses. The judge found that the mother was, in fact, partially dependent on the daughter to "make ends meet," and the judge awarded the mother $185.40 per week in benefits. Both the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board and the Commonwealth Court agreed with the judge's decision.

June 17, 2007

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Refuses to Offset Fatal Claim Benefits

When an injured worker receives workers' compensation benefits, those benefits can be offset or reduced when the injured worker begins to collect his or her Social Security Retirement benefits. The amount by which th workers' compensation benefit is reduced is determined by how much the injured worker receives in Social Security Retirement benefits. However, in the case of Zurich vs. WCAB (Bryan), the Commonwealth Court was faced with determining how this applies to a case where a widow was receiving fatal claim benefits as a result of her husband's fatal work injury when he fell from a crane. At the time of the husband's death, neither the victim nor his widow were collecting their Social Security Retirement benefits. Subsequent to the tragedy, the widow began to receive the benefits based on her status as the surviving widow of the decedent. The workers' compensation insurance carrier attempted to reduce her workers' compensation benefits based on her receipt of the Social Security Retirement benefits. However, the Court examined the applicable statute and found no mention of applying the offset to fatal claim benefits and refused to do so. The widow was entitled to continue receiving the workers' compensation fatal claim benefits without any reduction.

June 15, 2007

Attorney Jerry Lehocky Served as Faculty for Pennsylvania Chamber of Business & Industry Seminar

Martin, Banks, Pond, Lehocky & Wilson attorney Jerry M. Lehocky served as faculty for the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business & Industry program entitled "Workers' Compensation Roundtable: Reducing the Costs - How New Litigation Changes Benefit Employers and Claimants." Mr. Lehocky discussed the new changes to the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act that were signed into law in November 2006, which included resolution hearing procedures, mandatory mediation and trial schedules, and a cap on attorneys’ fees.

Mr. Lehocky was instrumental in drafting the legislation’s actual language, meeting and negotiating with other interested groups, testifying before the Pennsylvania House Labor and Relations Committee and working with the Legislature to create the positive changes. This new law is the first “pro-worker” legislation enacted in over 30 years!

June 12, 2007

Attorney Joseph Huttemann Participates in Bucks County Bar Association Semianr

Martin, Banks, Pond, Lehocky & Wilson attorney Joseph C. Huttemann recently served as a speaker for the Bucks County Bar Association's seminar entitled "Workers' Compensation: Burdens of Proof." Mr. Huttemann serves as the co-chair of the Bucks County Bar Association's Workers' Compensation Section.

June 8, 2007

Commonwealth Court Holds Firm on Employees Demonstrating Abnormal Working Conditions in Psychological Injury Claims

The Commonwealth Court in Babich v. WCAB (CPA Department of Corrections), handed down another in a long line of decisions making it difficult for workers to collect workers' compensation benefits based on an alleged psychological injury resulting from non-physical stimuli in the work environment. The courts have consistently held that an employee must demonstrate that the psychological injury occurred due to an "abnormal working condition." In this case, the employee was a registered nurse in a state prison. During his employment, the claimant was subject to having feces and urine thrown on him, having threats made against him and his familly, and had to attend to several traumatic emergency situations including, but not limited to, one instance where an inmate mutilated his own genitals, and the employee had to retrieve a stray testicle from the cell floor. Based on testimony from several simlarly-employed individuals, the judge agreed with the employer's argument that the claimant's workplace experiences were not abnormal for someone in his specific line of work and place of employment. The claim for psychological benefits was denied.

June 5, 2007

Attorney Alfred Carlson Participates in PESI Seminar

Martin, Banks, Pond, Lehocky & Wilson attorney Alfred J. Carlson participated in the PESI's 20th Annual Workers' Compensation Law Seminar. Mr. Carlson discussed an overview of the 2006 amendments to the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act including mandatory mediation, new hearing scheduling procedures, changes affecting the appeals board process, and strategies for practitioners litigating and settling cases. The seminar took place on April 20, 2007.