July 27, 2007

Commonwealth Court Prevents Workers' Compensation Insurance Carriers From Limiting Injured Worker Recourse

The Commonwealth Court in Ruth Hough v. WCAB (AC&T Companies) handed down an important ruling that prevented workers' compensation insurance carriers from limiting an injured worker's recourse when medical bills are not paid in a timely manner. In Hough, the injured worker filed a Penalty Petition alleging that the insurance carrier had failed to pay for the claimant's prescription medications in the time period prescribed by the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act and its medical cost containment regulations. The workers' compensation judge granted the Penalty Petition and assessed penalties against the carrier. The carrier appealed, arguing that rather than filing a Penalty Petition, the claimant was obligated to first seek to rectify the issue by filing a fee review request under Section 306(f.1)(5) of the Act. This Section calls for an "administrative decision" by the Department of Labor and Industry where the medical provider is alleging that the carrier is not making payment in the proper amount or in a timely manner. The Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) agreed with the carrier and reversed the judge's award. The Claimant then appealed to the Commonwealth Court.

Continue reading "Commonwealth Court Prevents Workers' Compensation Insurance Carriers From Limiting Injured Worker Recourse" »

July 25, 2007

Samuel H. Pond Elected to Board of Trustees of Philadelphia Bar Foundation

Martin, Banks, Pond, Lehocky & Wilson attorney Samuel H. Pond has been elected to the Board of Trustees of the Philadelphia Bar Foundation. The Philadelphia Bar Foundation was founded in 1964 for the purpose of promoting access to justice for all people in the Philadelphia community, particularly those struggling with poverty, abuse, and discrimination.

July 17, 2007

Commonwealth Court Compels Injured Worker to Attend IME

In Davis v. Woolworth Corporation(WCAB), the Commonwealth Court compelled an injured worker to attend an independent medical examination (IME) where the claimant had previously settled the wage loss (indemnity) portion of her claim and had not had an IME in the past seven years. The claimant argued, among other things, that the mere passage of time was not a basis on which to compel a claimant to attend an IME. The Court held that the passage of time is, in fact, grounds to compel such an exam. The Court cited long-established practice and case law which generally allow an employer to have a claimant attend an exam twice a year. To view the entire decision, click here

July 13, 2007

Commonwealth Court Again Refuses to Allow Claimants to Use IRE Results to Limit Employer's Right to Stop Workers' Comp

In a decision filed on June 18, 2007, the Commonwealth Court once again refused to allow claimants to use an Impairment Rating Evaluation (IRE) results to limit the employer's right to attempt to stop workers' compensation benefits. In Weismantle v. WCAB (Lucent Technologies), the Court held that an employer's Termination Petition was not foreclosed where the employer also requested an IRE while the Termination Petition was pending. This decision comes on the heels of the Court's 2006 decision in Schachter v. WCAB (SPS Technologies), wherein the Court ruled that an IRE showing a percentage whole-body impairment did not preclude the employer from later seeking a termination of benefits. To view the entire decision, click here.

Continue reading "Commonwealth Court Again Refuses to Allow Claimants to Use IRE Results to Limit Employer's Right to Stop Workers' Comp" »