October 15, 2007

Commonwealth Court Affirms Employers Can Be Liable for Penalties If They Cease Paying Medical Bills

The Commonwealth Court affirmed their position that if an employer unilaterally ceases to pay a claimant's medical bills on causation grounds, they can be held liable for penalties if a workers' compensation judge finds that the billsare causally related to the work injury. However, the Court reaffirmed that the imposition of a penalty in this situation is at the discretion of the workers' compensation judge.

In Delarosa v. WCAB (Masonic Homes), the claimant settled the partial disability benefits of her case through a lump sum settlement, but her employer remained liable for any reasonable and necessary medical expenses that are incurred as related to her work injury. The settlement occurred in 1997. In early 1998, the claimant filed a penalty petition against the employer, alleging that the employer had failed to reasonable medical expenses incurred by the claimant between 1996 and 1998 as a result of her work injury. In question was if the medical treatment was causally related to the claimant's work injury. The Court found that the treatment was medically necessary and related to her work injury and ordered the employer to pay for the expenses. With regards to the penalty petition, the Court stated that the imposition of a penalty in these types of situations is up to the workers' compensation judge who hears the penalty, and not the Court, and thus, denied the penalty petition.

October 10, 2007

Commonwealth Court Determines IOD Benefits Do Not Amount to Constructive Compliance

The Commonwealth Court determined that an employer was in violation of the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act by failing to pay benefits on a workers' compensation judge's order that granted benefits. In City of Philadelphia v. WCAB (Sherlock), the claimant was injured while on duty and filed a claim petition seeking workers' compensation benefits. The claimant's employer did not respond to the petition, and the workers' compensation judge awarded the claimant's benefits. The employer did not file an appeal against the order, but failed to pay any workers' compensation benefits. The claimant then filed a penalty petition against the employer, alleging that the employer violated the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act (the Act) by refusing to pay the workers' compensation benefits awarded by the workers' compensation judge. The employer aruged that it had complied with the order because they paid the claimant Injured On Duty (IOD) benefits based on the claimant's special civil service agreement. The workers' compensation judge sided with the employer and denied the claimant's penalty petition.

The claimant then appealed to the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) where the decision was reversed. The WCAB stated that 1) the claimant's IOD benefits did not amount to compliance with the judge's order and 2) there was no dispute that the employer failed to pay any workers' compensation benefits pursuant to the first judge's order, and this was a clear violation of the Act. The case was remanded back to a workers' compensation judge for further findings limited only to the issue of whether penalties, litigation expenses, and attorney fees should be assessed against the employer for violation of the Act.

Continue reading "Commonwealth Court Determines IOD Benefits Do Not Amount to Constructive Compliance" »

October 10, 2007

George Martin Serves as Faculty for PaTLA's Annual Update for Civil Litigators

George Martin, Managing Partner of Martin, Banks, Pond, Lehocky & Wilson, served as faculty for the Annual Update for Civil Litigators hosted by the Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association (PaTLA). Mr. Martin discussed major issues in the Pennsylvania workers' compensation area that affect attorneys across the state.

October 10, 2007

George E. Martin Elected President-Elect of American Association of Justice's Workers' Compensation Section

Martin, Banks, Pond, Lehocky & Wilson Managing Partner George E. Martin was recently elected President-Elect for the American Association of Justice's (AAJ) Workers' Compensation Section. Formerly the American Trial Lawyers Association, the AAJ's Workers' Compensation Section provide a means for members to unite with others practicing in similar areas of the law. Each Section encompasses an area of litigation practice that is broader than those addressed by litigation groups.

October 1, 2007

Melissa R. Chandy Joins Martin, Banks, Pond, Lehocky & Wilson

Martin, Banks, Pond, Lehocky & Wilson has expanded its workers’ compensation practice with the addition of Melissa R. Chandy as an Associate. Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Chandy served as a law clerk for the Office of General Counsel - Department of Labor and Industry -Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board. In her position, she was responsible for drafting opinions of appealed cases for consideration and issuance by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board Commissioners.

In 2006, Ms. Chandy earned her law degree from Dickinson School of Law at Pennsylvania State University, where she was a member of the Minority Law Students Association and the Asian Pacific American Law Students Association. She was also a member of Delta Theta Phi Law Fraternity. She received her bachelor of commerce degree in 2003 from the University of Toronto. Ms. Chandy is licensed to practice in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and is a member of the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Women in the Profession Committee and Minority Bar Committee. She is also an active member of the Philadelphia Trial Lawyers Association and the Philadelphia Bar Association.